<![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]><![CDATA[Free Speech]]>Featured

LH Grey Goes OFF on Toads Who Doxxed Cynical Publius in Maybe the Most VICIOUS Post We’ve Ever Seen on X – Twitchy

As Twitchy readers know, cowardly a-holes at War on the Rocks couldn’t handle the truth, so they doxxed Cynical Publius, putting him and his entire family at risk because he dared criticize the war college.





As our readers also know, this did not go well for the toads who have been busy blocking and trying to do damage control since. 

They’re big and tough when it comes to exposing a man to crazy leftists, but call them out on social media? THEY RUN FAST. Take it from this editor, ahem.

User LHGrey summed up how angry the majority of X is about what the trolls have done – this is damn good:

Post continues:

… platform…is no dispassionate analysis; it is a venomous apologia for digital vigilantism, a lethal rationalization that courts foreseeable harm to a man whose only “crime” was daring to speak from behind the shield he chose.

Spare me your selective historiography and your facile “he benefits” dismissal, complete with not-so-subtle nods to Trump-era sinecures. 

The Founders’ “Publius” was never mere vanity, classical cosplay, or “worst-kept secret” parlor trick, as your cherry-picked citations to Warner and Wood would have you believe if read without ideological blinders. 

Hamilton, Madison, and Jay deployed that pseudonym as deliberate armor…protection against reprisal, duels, defamation suits, and political violence in a republic still trembling on the edge of collapse. 

Cynical Publius invoked that exact legacy with purpose. 

Stripping it does not honor tradition; it betrays it, transforming the arena of ideas into the blood sport the Founders explicitly sought to prevent. 

Your “live by the sword” sophistry is a grotesque false equivalence: anonymity is not aggression…it is the last bulwark against the very mobs and inquisitors you now cheerlead.

Psychologically, your insistence that exposure inflicts “no professional consequences” and may even advance a career is textbook bully pathology: 

the sadistic thrill of dominance reframed as tough love, the gaslighter’s taunt that dismisses the shattering of agency, the perpetual shadow of targeted malice, and the raw terror of knowing one’s family, livelihood, and physical safety now lie exposed to ideologues, opportunists, and stochastic violence. 

This is not insight; it is projection born of insecurity…the compulsion to police and unmask because veiled voices pierce the curated narratives you cannot control. 

You do not get to arbitrate another man’s vulnerability or declare his involuntary outing a net positive simply because political winds have shifted.

Legally, while federal statute lacks a blanket “doxxing” crime, your publication and defense tread directly into actionable territory: 

intentional revelation of identifying information calculated to invite harassment violates cyberstalking provisions (18 U.S.C. § 2261A), intentional infliction of emotional distress, and an expanding lattice of state anti-doxxing torts and criminal statutes…Washington’s civil remedies, broader privacy invasions, and platform rules that explicitly ban precisely this conduct when it foreseeably endangers life or livelihood. 

Your “none of it applies” posture ignores the asymmetry entirely: 

the Founders operated among lettered elites with limited reach; we navigate an ecosystem where one article can summon swatting teams or career-ending smears overnight. 

None of your erudite rationalizations apply because they rest on callous outcome-based ethics rather than principle.

You are no guardian of the Republic’s traditions, Evans. 

You are their Judas…weaponizing historical knowledge to justify modern barbarism the Founders would have recognized as tyranny by another name.

The discourse you claim to defend demands better than your venomous hypocrisy and lethal indifference to the very human cost you pretend does not exist.

Recommended

And boom.

============================================================

Related:

Who Wants to Tell Her? Dem Rep Shakes Her Fist at Trump REFUSING to Pass the SAVE ACT, Just 1 Big Problem

WATCH Cory Booker’s Face As Jake Tapper Pushes Back on His Lie About Republicans Shutting DHS Down -Video

So … What’s Going on Between Chris Murphy and Iran?

Law Professor Completely NUKING AOC and Her ‘I’m Devastated’ Post About MI Synagogue Attack Is GLORIOUS

TX Democrat Wack-Job FAFOs Hard After Peddling Insane ‘Married Friend’ Sob Story to Stop the SAVE Act

============================================================


Editor’s Note: The radical left will stop at nothing to enact their radical gun control agenda and strip us of our Second Amendment rights.

Help us continue to report on and expose the Democrats’ gun control policies and schemes. Join Twitchy VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your VIP membership.





Source link

Related Posts

Load More Posts Loading...No More Posts.