<![CDATA[Jeffrey Epstein]]><![CDATA[Katie Pavlich]]>Featured

Katie Pavlich Shares Important SCOTUS Ruling Impacting Epstein Files Release – Twitchy

February 28, 2025

Like many of you, we were frustrated with yesterday’s nothing-burger of an Epstein Files release. Not only was the information we were able to look through old and redacted, but the theatrics around the Epstein binders left people feeling disappointed and even betrayed. Why the binders? Why the old info? Why the redacted old info? None of it made any sense even to those of us who cover this insanity for a living.

Katie Pavlich was good enough to shed a little more light on what may be going on.

Take a look:

Hi everyone. Re: Epstein files. Ghislane Maxwell, Epstein’s accomplice, is currently on appeal to the Supreme Court (filed January 2025) so don’t expect much new from DOJ until that is resolved. This was the situation today, will be tomorrow and the foreseeable future. pic.twitter.com/SSZvsaeTla

— Katie Pavlich (@KatiePavlich) February 28, 2025

So, in other words, there won’t likely be any new information released until the Maxwell appeal is resolved.

Note, we are certainly not experts on any of this, but the ruling most definitely makes us wonder if this is the reason they’re releasing the information in phases: because they knew they couldn’t release everything all at once. They knew about the appeal (they had to) and perhaps planned to spread out the documents and time them with the Maxwell appeal.

Or maybe it’s all just a big mess because Biden left it that way, and we’re overthinking it.

Either way, this was not exactly a great look.

This, of course, is 100% correct

The question becomes:

Why would the Attorney General promise something different?

What was this thing – whatever it’s called – on the north steps of the White House today?

From a PR perspective, it failed miserably

— Phil Holloway ✈️ (@PhilHollowayEsq) February 28, 2025