<![CDATA[bathroom]]><![CDATA[civil rights]]><![CDATA[Denver]]><![CDATA[public schools]]><![CDATA[Title IX]]><![CDATA[transgender]]>Featured

DoE to Investigate School District for Turning Girls’ Restrooms Into All-Gender Restrooms – Twitchy

We’re sorry to say that the Department of Education hasn’t been closed down yet, but its Office for Civil Rights seems to be doing something worthwhile. According to The Denver Post, the Denver Public Schools District converted the girls’ second-floor restroom over winter break into an all-gender restroom, while the boys’ restroom was left alone. (The story doesn’t say if they installed tampon dispensers.)





Jessica Seaman reports:

East, the city’s largest high school, converted a girls restroom into a bathroom for all genders over the winter break. As a result, the school has a bathroom for boys on the second floor but not for girls, according to a news release from the Education Department.

“The alarming report that the Denver Public Schools District denied female students a restroom comparable with their male counterparts appears to directly violate the civil rights of the district’s female students,” Craig Trainor, President Donald Trump’s acting assistant secretary for civil rights, said in a statement.

“Let me be clear: It is a new day in America, and under President Trump, OCR will not tolerate discrimination of any kind. I have directed OCR’s Denver regional office to investigate this matter fully.”

DPS defended the all-gender restroom at East, noting that it was added “as the result of a student-led process that reflects our commitment to inclusivity and student voice, leadership, and empowerment, providing a welcoming space for all.”

Empowerment? Since when does turning a girls-only space into a “welcoming space for all” empower girls?

Recommended

“It would have been more expensive to create a third all-gender multi-stall restroom and the school didn’t have to remove urinals from the boys’ bathroom,” said district spokesman Scott Pribble. It will be a lot more expensive to lose the district’s $96 million in federal grant funding.

***




Source link

Related Posts

Load More Posts Loading...No More Posts.