CongressDavid GruschEric DavisFeaturedMark WarnerOpinionPresident Donald TrumpPresident Joe BidenTechnologyTim Kaine

America needs a strategy for advanced drones and other emerging technologies 

A revolution long kept secret now stirs the surface of national security, propelled by emerging all-domain technologies. These include advanced drones, unidentified anomalous phenomena or UAP (formerly called UFOs) and clandestine, high-tech weapons.

Capable of moving between air, space and sea, these systems can conduct intelligence and even kinetic strikes. Despite the lingering stigma at home, foreign adversaries are racing to understand UAP in particular — potentially upending geopolitics alongside our knowledge of physics.  

This sounds like science fiction, but it’s scientific fact. As a former senior counterintelligence officer who led one of the Pentagon’s UAP investigations, I recently testified before Congress that the revolution is happening now. To stay ahead, America needs a whole-of-government strategy for these paradigm-changing technologies.  

Just look up. The Ukrainian conflict has seen rapid advancements in drones, artificial intelligence and hypersonic missiles, exploiting asymmetrical advantages against traditionally dominant weapons like warships and tanks. China is watching closely. Beyond spy balloons — like the one that floated over the homeland in 2023 — Beijing is fielding space-age technologies to test the United States and our allies. 

When it comes to UAP, the Pentagon grudgingly admits after decades of denial that some demonstrate beyond-next-generation speed, maneuverability and stealth. UAP also traverse our skies — and waters — with apparent impunity. The mysterious “drones” spotted above sensitive sites in Virginia, New Jersey and elsewhere have confounded the Defense Department and an alphabet soup of other agencies tasked with protecting America. More than 20 years after terrorists flew aircraft into buildings on 9/11, the government lacks a complete picture of our airspace. That is unacceptable.  

Then there are whistleblowers like David Grusch, a former U.S. Air Force major and colleague of mine who analyzed UAP as part of a Pentagon task force. He testified under oath before Congress that the government is reverse-engineering craft of “non-human” origin. Eric Davis, an astrophysicist who advised a Pentagon UAP program, reported briefing defense officials on retrievals of “off-world vehicles not made on this Earth.” While extraordinary, these claims demand investigation. Ignoring them only deepens mistrust in our government. 

Early signs are encouraging that the new administration and Congress are taking these matters seriously. President Trump pledged greater candor, calling it “ridiculous that they are not telling you what is going on with the drones.” Senate Intelligence Committee members Mark Warner (D-Va.) and Tim Kaine (D-Va.), expressed shock at the government’s inability to explain incursions over Langley Air Force Base in Virginia in 2023. A bipartisan caucus of lawmakers has held hearings and called for a special committee to investigate UAP. 

But more must be done. Some national security experts recommend that a single coordinator manage the interagency response to drones. Because America’s enemies are unlocking UAP technology to gain a decisive edge, however, UAP can no longer be distinguished entirely from unmanned systems. Although the Pentagon has claimed that no UAP represent foreign adversaries, it has failed to resolve most sightings. Its UAP office — created at congressional insistence — remains mired in bureaucracy and suspicion. Russia and China are reverse-engineering UAP.   

Over-compartmentalization of classified projects has further stifled U.S. research, leaving America at a disadvantage to its would-be rivals. Meanwhile, the implications for our industrial base, military doctrine and force posture remain neglected. Worse, U.S. diplomacy has yet to confront the perils to arms control, nonproliferation and global stability these technologies pose. 

A broader view is therefore essential. To address these challenges, the president should appoint a senior advisor for Emerging All-Domain Technologies within the National Security Council. This “czar” would coordinate a whole-of-government response, ensuring federal, state and local authorities work together. The advisor would integrate data collection and streamline information-sharing across agencies to establish a comprehensive view of the air, space and sea domains.  

The government must also develop a forward-looking national strategy for these technologies. This includes identifying threats and opportunities at home and overseas, setting research and development priorities, and providing guidance to academic and private-sector partners. Transparency is vital. To rebuild public trust, our government must engage with Congress, the media and citizens. Efforts to release UAP-related records should follow a 25-year classification period unless explicitly exempted by the president.  

As President John F. Kennedy said, “Change is the law of life. And those who look only to the past or the present are certain to miss the future.” The rise of emerging all-domain technologies can no longer be ignored. How our nation responds will determine its leadership in a rapidly changing world. Americans deserve the truth — and a strategy to safeguard their future. 

Luis D. Elizondo is a former senior counterintelligence officer who previously led the Pentagon’s investigation into UAP.

Source link

Related Posts

Load More Posts Loading...No More Posts.