The House on Friday advanced a bill to reauthorize the U.S.’s warrantless surveillance authority, opening the measure up for debate two days after a band of conservatives blocked a previous version of the legislation from moving forward.
The chamber cleared the rule — which governs debate for legislation — in a 213-208 vote, teeing up a final vote on a bill that reauthorizes Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) for two years and institutes a number of reforms to the spying powers.
A final vote on the legislation — in addition to a number of amendments — is slated for around 11:45 a.m. eastern time on Friday. Congress is facing an April 19 deadline to reauthorize the program.
Section 702 of FISA allows for the warrantless surveillance of foreigners located abroad, which proponents have said is key to fighting terrorism. But in that process, the government also sweeps up communications from Americans who are interacting with individuals being spied on.
That dynamic prompted a group of privacy hawks to push for an amendment that would add a warrant requirement before the government is able to review information collected on Americans, which will also receive a vote on Friday.
Advancement of the FISA bill is a significant development in the months-long battle that has ensued over reauthorizing the U.S.’s warrantless spying powers.
The fight hit a fever pitch on Wednesday, when 19 Republicans tanked a procedural vote for a previous version of the FISA bill, blocking it from moving forward, dealing an embarrassing blow to Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), and forcing lawmakers back to the drawing board as they looked for a compromise on reauthorizing the spying powers.
After negotiations, leadership changed the legislation to reauthorize FISA for two years rather than five, a detail that helped assuage concerns of the GOP holdouts. Those opponents also said leadership committed to holding a vote on a bill sponsored by Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio) that would require the government to get a warrant before purchasing information about U.S. citizens from data brokers.
With those changes and commitments, a number of the GOP holdouts said they would back the rule on Friday.
“Barring anything else, I will be good,” Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.) said Thursday.
